Tiger
08-10-2008, 10:32 AM
While we were away for a week, Lucky died. We had left him being looked after, but he had to stay in his cage while nobody was home, while Daisy had the run of the house (and mostly stayed in her favourite place for winter - a sunny bathroom). Lucky just couldn't fly well enough to be left.
Thinking back, it's possible Lucky has never been as well as he should have been. His beak was over-long and because he was heavily clipped on one wing only, he broke the tip off his beak when he took off by accident on his second day with us and crashed into a wall. He also was bleeding slightly from what seemed to be a cut on his chest.
The vet said his beak would be fine, it actually was now the right length. The chest wound should heal, she said, and gave us antibiotics to put in his water. We had to keep him quiet in his cage, which we did. But it seemed his chest wound would keep oozing. He would seem to heal, he'd be fine - then it would look like a little staining on his chest feathers again. But he wouldn't let us look at it, he seemed a bit sensitive.
By this stage he was flying straight despite the badly clipped wing. No more crashes. He would just lose altitude and end up on the floor, trotting around the house looking for someone to lift him up to where he wanted to be.
With no more crashes, and he wasn't picking at his chest (although we thought a re-bleed could have been due to him picking off the scab soon after his injury) we just kept hoping the chest would heal. We also knew it wasn't Daisy attacking him, either. There seemed to be nothing that could be causing any problem, and there was so little marking it was always possible we were mistaken, it was just a mark on his chest or old staining. The vet had said to keep an eye on him but to keep him quiet and he should heal.
He seemed bright, happy and alert a lot of the time but would doze off a lot more than Daisy. Since budgies are said to sleep a lot we just figured he was sleepier because he was younger than Daisy.
When he died, his bird-sitter put him in the freezer. We examined him before we buried him - his chest wound hadn't healed. It hadn't been bleeding, it was just slightly open. He had lost his longer tail feathers too. His weight - he had weighed 32 g two weeks earlier, when he died he weighed 29 g. That could have been within error range or it could have been the fewer tail feathers, or both.
We wanted to replace Lucky as soon as possible because Daisy had already lost one mate and had just begun to enjoy having another friend. There were only two shops. One said they didn't have budgies at the time but might in a few days; and that with our exceptionally cold winter, even budgies indoors were dying, it could well have been the cold especially if he was not as strong as our other budgie.
The other shop (that DID have budgies) said that it was almost certainly worms; budgies die of worms more than of anything else. He was insistent. He said nobody ever worms their birds, and they should. Feeling guilty because I hadn't known this and Daisy had never been wormed, I bought the worming solution he sold us and brought it home with Buddy.
But I haven't been able to verify any of this information. Certainly the vet hadn't said anything about needing to worm Lucky. We were almost due to go back to the vet again for a health check and beak trim - we had planned to on our return from holiday. I would have thought that if worms were such a problem in budgies, surely the vet would have said something?
I followed the instructions and wormed Daisy. The shopkeeper said Buddy had just been wormed, he would need to be done again in two weeks (which will be when Daisy is due for a repeat, now).
Has anyone heard this? And can anyone shed light on this mysterious non-healing tiny wound (for want of a better term)? It sounds terrible, but it was really small and any blood loss would have been less than two drops, over all the time we had him (about 6 months). It was so little that apart from the first incident, we could never be sure if there was even a problem, or if we just had a bird who had some slight pigmentation there.
One more thing - I saw today when Buddy took a bath for the first time - when a budgie baths, even if he submerges he doesn't get soaked through. Lucky used to get absolutely soaking wet and take ages to dry. He was a lutino and I wonder if this also meant he was more vulnerable, not so strong?
Any clues welcome. I want to keep these two birds healthy and happy, but I don't want to put them trough unnecessary chemicals, antibiotics or whatever, not unless they're really needed.
And if the vet missed something obvious and should have said something more, I need to know if we should find a new vet!
Thinking back, it's possible Lucky has never been as well as he should have been. His beak was over-long and because he was heavily clipped on one wing only, he broke the tip off his beak when he took off by accident on his second day with us and crashed into a wall. He also was bleeding slightly from what seemed to be a cut on his chest.
The vet said his beak would be fine, it actually was now the right length. The chest wound should heal, she said, and gave us antibiotics to put in his water. We had to keep him quiet in his cage, which we did. But it seemed his chest wound would keep oozing. He would seem to heal, he'd be fine - then it would look like a little staining on his chest feathers again. But he wouldn't let us look at it, he seemed a bit sensitive.
By this stage he was flying straight despite the badly clipped wing. No more crashes. He would just lose altitude and end up on the floor, trotting around the house looking for someone to lift him up to where he wanted to be.
With no more crashes, and he wasn't picking at his chest (although we thought a re-bleed could have been due to him picking off the scab soon after his injury) we just kept hoping the chest would heal. We also knew it wasn't Daisy attacking him, either. There seemed to be nothing that could be causing any problem, and there was so little marking it was always possible we were mistaken, it was just a mark on his chest or old staining. The vet had said to keep an eye on him but to keep him quiet and he should heal.
He seemed bright, happy and alert a lot of the time but would doze off a lot more than Daisy. Since budgies are said to sleep a lot we just figured he was sleepier because he was younger than Daisy.
When he died, his bird-sitter put him in the freezer. We examined him before we buried him - his chest wound hadn't healed. It hadn't been bleeding, it was just slightly open. He had lost his longer tail feathers too. His weight - he had weighed 32 g two weeks earlier, when he died he weighed 29 g. That could have been within error range or it could have been the fewer tail feathers, or both.
We wanted to replace Lucky as soon as possible because Daisy had already lost one mate and had just begun to enjoy having another friend. There were only two shops. One said they didn't have budgies at the time but might in a few days; and that with our exceptionally cold winter, even budgies indoors were dying, it could well have been the cold especially if he was not as strong as our other budgie.
The other shop (that DID have budgies) said that it was almost certainly worms; budgies die of worms more than of anything else. He was insistent. He said nobody ever worms their birds, and they should. Feeling guilty because I hadn't known this and Daisy had never been wormed, I bought the worming solution he sold us and brought it home with Buddy.
But I haven't been able to verify any of this information. Certainly the vet hadn't said anything about needing to worm Lucky. We were almost due to go back to the vet again for a health check and beak trim - we had planned to on our return from holiday. I would have thought that if worms were such a problem in budgies, surely the vet would have said something?
I followed the instructions and wormed Daisy. The shopkeeper said Buddy had just been wormed, he would need to be done again in two weeks (which will be when Daisy is due for a repeat, now).
Has anyone heard this? And can anyone shed light on this mysterious non-healing tiny wound (for want of a better term)? It sounds terrible, but it was really small and any blood loss would have been less than two drops, over all the time we had him (about 6 months). It was so little that apart from the first incident, we could never be sure if there was even a problem, or if we just had a bird who had some slight pigmentation there.
One more thing - I saw today when Buddy took a bath for the first time - when a budgie baths, even if he submerges he doesn't get soaked through. Lucky used to get absolutely soaking wet and take ages to dry. He was a lutino and I wonder if this also meant he was more vulnerable, not so strong?
Any clues welcome. I want to keep these two birds healthy and happy, but I don't want to put them trough unnecessary chemicals, antibiotics or whatever, not unless they're really needed.
And if the vet missed something obvious and should have said something more, I need to know if we should find a new vet!